PR or Advertising: Who Should Be Managing your Sponsored Conversations?

A sponsored online conversation is loosely defined as the practice of paying a blogger to post about your brand. It was gained widespread attention last winter when Kmart engaged pay-for-post pioneer IZEA to recruit online influencers to go on free shopping sprees in exchange for unfiltered posts about their experiences. Since then, marketers, PR executives, analysts and the blogging community alike have deliberated over whether or not this is a legitimate, ethical form of marketing. General consensus says it’s legit, if managed the right way. According to Forrester’s Sean Corcoran, the right way boils down to two things: 1) sponsorship transparency and 2) blogger authenticity:

“Sponsorship transparency means that both the marketer and the blogger must make it absolutely clear to the reader community that they are reading paid content – think of Google Adwords “Sponsored Links.” Blogger authenticity means that the blogger should have complete freedom to write in their own voice – even if the content they write about the brand is negative.”

At the Bateman Group, we agree sponsored conversations can be a very effective channel to engage influential bloggers around a hot topic, trend or product. This is why we’ve been brokering these conversations on behalf of our clients for nearly three years – well before the phrase was coined. While I like to believe we were ahead of the curve, the concept has recently caught on like wildfire. Just check out Jeremiah Owyang’s running list of sponsored conversations involving several household brands.

During a meeting I had with IZEA’s Randy Mountz last spring, he explained that more than half of the other new business meetings he arranged in San Francisco that week were with ad agencies, the remainder being integrated PR and social media marketing firms (like the Bateman Group) and several social media specialty shops.  I found it puzzling that we (PR) were in the minority. True, sponsored conversation is paid media, and paid media has historically been handled by ad agencies. Yet, how could our counterparts at Saatchi & Saatchi or Leo Burnett be in the same position to broker a sponsored conversation with an influential blogger whom we personally know and follow?

Although ad agencies may have demographic info on a particular blogger’s audience and unique visitors, we know their hot buttons, we’re familiar with the angles that will engage more of their readers (versus turn them off), and we have the relationships. It’s not that the ad guys couldn’t do this in time, but we’re paid by our clients to do it every day. Having had the opportunity to accumulate this wisdom and network of organic relationships with bloggers over several years gives us a huge advantage to deliver value in this realm.

Within a few weeks of my meeting with IZEA, Forrester’s Josh Bernoff reinforced the fact that sponsored conversation sits somewhere in the middle of PR and advertising:

“In PR, you try to get a blogger to talk about you, but your chances of success are hit or miss. In advertising, you can be sure to get a placement, but it’s not in the blogger’s voice. Sponsored conversation – paying a blogger to write about your product – fits in the middle. It guarantees a post, and it’s in the blogger’s voice.”

Josh is a smart guy and his explanation makes perfect sense on one level: Sponsored conversations do admittedly encompass facets of both disciplines. However, because PR/social media marketing practitioners have much more organic relationships with bloggers by virtue of our day-to-day job requirements, I predict that we will emerge as the de facto brokers of these conversations in the future, not the ad agency account execs.

These are some of the basic principles we follow at the Bateman Group when producing high-value sponsored conversations for our clients:

  1. At the most fundamental level, being successful with sponsored conversation requires picking blogs and bloggers that are a match with a client’s product and/or thought leadership agenda. This is why it makes sense for our client Panda Security to work with Dana Gardner, a ZDNet blogger, to talk about trends in cloud security with fellow ZDNet blogger and SaaS analyst Phil Wainewright.
  2. Building relationships with bloggers and their extended peer network can create a ripple effect. When we facilitate sponsored conversations for our clients, we regularly invite peer influencers (analysts, bloggers, etc.) to engage around a single topic or product in a roundtable format. Bloggers are often motivated by their peers and appreciate being invited to the table. And the content instantly becomes more credible and reaches more people.
  3. Sponsored conversation shouldn’t just be used as a vehicle to promote a product. We’ve found it can also, more often than not, be a very powerful platform for thought leadership. A good integrated PR/social media marketing agency understands how to strike the right balance between authentically organizing a community of influencers around your brand and blatantly pushing a product.
  4. If you’re looking for scale and want to engage an agency like IZEA to manage a broader campaign that includes tens, hundreds or potentially thousands of bloggers, then quality control is key. Integrated PR/social media marketing agencies are in a better position to help these pay-per-post networks prioritize the right blend of bloggers and engage the most influential ones with a compelling hook that appeals to their loyal followers.

The latest stir in the world of sponsored conversation is around the concept of sponsored tweets, but I’ll leave that for a later post once the model has been tried and tested. In the meantime, I’m curious to get your thoughts on who will emerge as the driving agents of sponsored conversations within the blogosphere…

7 Comments »

 
  1. laurent says:

    What I find interesting in your post is that ad agencies and pr agencies leverage different angle for sponsored conversations and as such it’s reflected in Josh’s statement about what they get.
    Ad agency evaluate the ‘place’ (i.e: the blog) vs PR agency evaluate the ‘person’ (i.e the blogger). Anyway just a comment.
    To me, the key is relevance to produce the most impact. And I’m not saying high tech here, i’m saying ‘topic relevance’ (i.e: security, virtualization to reuse your high tech example). I’ve seen sponsored conversations that were blatantly off topic (blogger wanted to make a few $$$) and that’s horrible. So knowing the blogger is key to efficiently target the right ones.
    I think whomever has relevant knowledge (domain and network) can be a driving agent for sponsored conversations in order to pick and choose the right bloggers. Ultimately the customers can do it too (and i’ve seen some doing it).

  2. Bill Bourdon says:

    laurent- thanks for your comment and interesting point on the “angle”. I would argue that to be most effective the agent really needs to be knowledgeable of both sides (blogger and blog). For example, I know and trust Dana Gardner (the sponsored blogger example), however his syndication network reaches a total possible audience of 300k users, which played heavily into our decision to partner with him. At the same time, we certainly recognize the major value that blogger networks like IZEA and others can play when it comes to scale and reach. And I agree that the customer can do it too :)

  3. Sponsored Tweets isn’t the end of the world as we know it…

    A few weeks back I got a Direct Message inviting me to check out Sponsored Tweets, and I had many of the same doubts and reservations any smart marketer would have. Last week, Ted Murphy took a handful of us……

  4. Tyler Perry says:

    Interesting post, Bill- this is obviously a hot topic right now. Mashable’s recent article http://mashable.com/2009/08/03/izea-sponsored-tweets/ has over 113 comments, with many strong opinions.

  5. laurent says:

    Yes both angles are critical.
    To me, and may be i’m oversimplifying the issue, it’s relevance that counts.
    We’re hard-wire for relevance. If something isn’t relevant, we see it so a blogger that published a sponsored conversation which is, even slightly, off topic from his main focus..isn’t doing a good deed to himself nor his audience.
    Another twist to this quest for relevance is that targeting a blogger that has a broad span (say, high tech), may dilute the message.
    I’m more an advocate of niche, laser-sharp targeting to achieve true relevance.
    But ;-) , I have never managed a sponsored post campaign ;-(

  6. Erin says:

    Great Post Bill!! Can’t wait to see how Sponsored Tweets are embraced by PR and Agencies alike. So far so good :)

  7. Helo there, well I can see that your statement is rather serious as it highlights lots of good info. By the way, was thinking whether you would love to interchange web links with my web space, as I am searching to establish web links to further spear point and gain better web exposure for my web space. I don’t really mind you placing my links at the sitewide page, just accepting this links on this respective page is more than adequate. Moreover, would you be kind enough message me back at my web space if you are interested in the link exchange, I would really appreciate that. Thanks a lot and hopefully to hear from you soon!

 

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>