Are spokespeople going the way of the dodo?
The Wall Street Journal has an interesting article from Dow Jones today entitled: “Companies Increasingly Look To Blogs As Spokesmen.” While I certainly agree with Lance Morgan, a communications strategist quoted in the article, that a corporate blog will not and should not replace the role of the corporate spokesperson, it can certainly augment it.
Corporate blogging is one of the many tools we often recommend integrating into our clients’ overall communications strategies. In our view, the benefits include the following :
- Offers an additional communications channel more casual than a press release
- Allows multiple voices from the executive team to be heard; humanizes the team and shows depth on the bench
- Provides a public platform for disseminating executive response to an industry or competitive issue, or framing context around some recent corporate news, both good and bad
- Gives a time-effective platform for companies to be quoted in breaking news stories
Oftentimes, journalists have to turn around a story on a dime and require executive commentary during those last minute scrambles – the corporate blog is a great place to snag a quote.
The latter point is why we recommend to avoid the marketing – and even press release – speak in favor of a genuine conversational tone when writing blog posts. There is no better way to ensure that a journalist or industry pundit will not return to your blog then by including cheesy marketing catch phrases or jargon filled techno-babble. The blog should also not be a regurgitation of the corporate press room. Perhaps we would recommend somewhere in between the pinstripes and pajamas. (Not sure if this happened to anyone else, but I was momentarily distracted by visions of executives in various types of sleepwear working feverishly from their laptops. Trade show tee shirts, nightshirts, footie PJs… Ok must stop, it is getting weird.)
For less urgent stories, a blog post can entice a journalist to hear more, but is never a complete substitute for a good old-fashioned conversation. This might be blasphemous as the trend of real-time communications pervades every channel. Harkening back to the post we did a while back on news embargoes and journalists’ increasing focus on beating other writers to breaking stories. Although it might mean sacrificing the occasional blue ribbon, some of the best articles stem from one-on-one personal engagement. Asking questions probe beneath the surface so tangents can turn into stories. An engaging dialog can spark compelling new insights that didn’t come to mind during that midnight typing session.
Will corporate blogs replace company spokespeople? Doubtful. Great journalism, in my opinion, is rooted in uncovering those juicy nuggets of information or insight that can only come from live dialog. I do see the corporate blog continuing to grow as a communications channel, as more and more media outlets rely on real-time news for the bulk of their content.


Great post, Tyler.
I think another main reason why corporate blogs will never altogether displace (executive-level) spokespeople is that many execs, while great spokespeople, are simply not good writers.
If a reporter wants authentic commentary (i.e. not ghost written by an exec’s PR rep), the old fashion interview is often the best source
Hi
While the benefit you described are valid, they’re very “company” centered, looking at blogs as spokesmen is wrong.
A ~year old study from forrester showed that people don’t trust much corpo blog (29% if my memory is correct) and the reason is that they talk mostly about the company/the products etc…(what a spokesmen does). It’s old marketing with an appearance of new.
Instead companies can leverage blogs to:
1) show they understand their market and are commitment to contribute to solve issues and help move it forward
2) networked with like-minded individuals outside the company and build valuable relationships
3) create an outside-in communication channel
It can be done if they have a “them” mindset prior to an “us” midset.
Hi Laurent,
Definitely agree with your point- we try and steer our clients away from using the blog as another forum to promote the company or its products. Bottom line is that is just not interesting for an outside party to read. A truly successful corporate blog sparks dialog and interaction, which usually means that the content needs to be provoking, interesting and not self-serving.
Appreciate the comments; look forward to hearing from you more!
Tyler
I agree (sparks dialog and interaction).
And that translate in ‘blog influence’.
At eCairn, we measure blog influence within niche communities (think “computer security” , “beauty” , “personal finance”….).
As an example, in the cloud computing community, a small startup called gogrid is doing better than the 880 lbs gorilla Amason, according to our ranking.
http://blog.gogrid.com/
vs
http://aws.typepad.com/aws/
Clearly one blog talks about Cloud Computing in general vs the other one is very focus on the company’s offering. It’s not bad but it draws less interest (backlinks, comments) that way. Thus less influence.
L
I forgot to say that the gogrid blog is #39 and the Amazon’s one is #434 in this community of ~550 bloggers we mapped.